<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Return of AC3</title>
	<link>http://runtime360.com/2006/04/28/the-return-of-ac3/</link>
	<description>on homebrew and misc stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: schmosef</title>
		<link>http://runtime360.com/2006/04/28/the-return-of-ac3/#comment-289</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 02:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://runtime360.com/2006/04/28/the-return-of-ac3/#comment-289</guid>
					<description>I'm too busy these days to be relied on as a tester.

I'm just glad that T360 has worked so well for me and I know it's because of so many other users spending their time to help runtime360 with this project.

Thanks everyone! Especially you runtime360!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m too busy these days to be relied on as a tester.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just glad that T360 has worked so well for me and I know it&#8217;s because of so many other users spending their time to help runtime360 with this project.</p>
<p>Thanks everyone! Especially you runtime360!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Schlicky</title>
		<link>http://runtime360.com/2006/04/28/the-return-of-ac3/#comment-288</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://runtime360.com/2006/04/28/the-return-of-ac3/#comment-288</guid>
					<description>As a new sponsor, I would also be very interested in interim builds, and helping with any co-ordination (I'm also based in the UK).

AC3 is a great step, but I don't have a cinema system, so I will also help ensure that any new builds don't effect us underdogs.

Great step fowards Runtime - we appreciate everything you are currently doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a new sponsor, I would also be very interested in interim builds, and helping with any co-ordination (I&#8217;m also based in the UK).</p>
<p>AC3 is a great step, but I don&#8217;t have a cinema system, so I will also help ensure that any new builds don&#8217;t effect us underdogs.</p>
<p>Great step fowards Runtime - we appreciate everything you are currently doing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: co</title>
		<link>http://runtime360.com/2006/04/28/the-return-of-ac3/#comment-287</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://runtime360.com/2006/04/28/the-return-of-ac3/#comment-287</guid>
					<description>Yes, I’ll be interested on testing new versions. I am intested also in 720p source material being displayed on the 360 without downscaling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I’ll be interested on testing new versions. I am intested also in 720p source material being displayed on the 360 without downscaling.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yesod</title>
		<link>http://runtime360.com/2006/04/28/the-return-of-ac3/#comment-286</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 02:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://runtime360.com/2006/04/28/the-return-of-ac3/#comment-286</guid>
					<description>Yes, I'll be interested on testing new versions. I'm focused on getting a better performance (my network and MCE computer are not really fast)and a better image quality. So, if you finally do it, count on me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;ll be interested on testing new versions. I&#8217;m focused on getting a better performance (my network and MCE computer are not really fast)and a better image quality. So, if you finally do it, count on me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Martin_G_3D</title>
		<link>http://runtime360.com/2006/04/28/the-return-of-ac3/#comment-285</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://runtime360.com/2006/04/28/the-return-of-ac3/#comment-285</guid>
					<description>I'm getting a high-def projector next week, and I just made a 15 dollar donation to your project. 

I would be interested in getting releases early and giving feedback. I'm mostly interested in stability (sometimes transcode locks up both my xbox and my pc o_0), ac3 support over spdif and if it's in sync and in image quality (which i'll be a good candidate to judge on on a 2 meter wide picture ;) )

So also would be nice if 720p xvid file's would be recognised and transfered as 720p and not downscaled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting a high-def projector next week, and I just made a 15 dollar donation to your project. </p>
<p>I would be interested in getting releases early and giving feedback. I&#8217;m mostly interested in stability (sometimes transcode locks up both my xbox and my pc o_0), ac3 support over spdif and if it&#8217;s in sync and in image quality (which i&#8217;ll be a good candidate to judge on on a 2 meter wide picture <img src='http://runtime360.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
<p>So also would be nice if 720p xvid file&#8217;s would be recognised and transfered as 720p and not downscaled.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: stevenz</title>
		<link>http://runtime360.com/2006/04/28/the-return-of-ac3/#comment-284</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://runtime360.com/2006/04/28/the-return-of-ac3/#comment-284</guid>
					<description>Generally if a project features CVS or alpha builds, then it's those versions that I'll be running. For people running obscure settings it might be useful for testing purposes, but the coordination of separate sponsors-only builds might be a bit of a hassle for you. 5.1 will certainly be welcomed though ;) I may have to start throwing some unusual AV codec combinations at it and see how it deals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally if a project features CVS or alpha builds, then it&#8217;s those versions that I&#8217;ll be running. For people running obscure settings it might be useful for testing purposes, but the coordination of separate sponsors-only builds might be a bit of a hassle for you. 5.1 will certainly be welcomed though <img src='http://runtime360.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I may have to start throwing some unusual AV codec combinations at it and see how it deals.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Puma81</title>
		<link>http://runtime360.com/2006/04/28/the-return-of-ac3/#comment-283</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://runtime360.com/2006/04/28/the-return-of-ac3/#comment-283</guid>
					<description>ahhh music to my ears!

Very nice work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahhh music to my ears!</p>
<p>Very nice work.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
